A chatbot that can be talked out of its instructions, or a RAG pipeline that returns another customer's documents, won't show up in a standard web application test. We attack your LLM applications the way an adversary would and show you exactly what got through.
Test for direct and indirect prompt injection attacks that can manipulate model behavior.
Evaluate resistance to jailbreaking techniques that bypass safety guardrails.
Assess retrieval-augmented generation systems for data poisoning and leakage risks.
Open-ended adversarial testing that chains techniques together to find security and safety failures.
Test content moderation and output filtering mechanisms for bypass vulnerabilities.
Identify risks of training data extraction and sensitive information disclosure.
Whether a user, or a document your application reads, can override the system prompt and make the model act against you.
How far your guardrails hold up when someone deliberately tries to talk the model past them.
Whether your retrieval-augmented generation pipeline hands users documents they shouldn't see, or can be fed content that manipulates answers.
Adversarial testing before launch, so security and safety issues surface in a report rather than in production.
Whether your content filters and safety mechanisms catch what they are meant to, and how easily they are bypassed.
Whether training data, PII or other sensitive information can be extracted through ordinary-looking prompts.
Scoping and threat modeling first, then hands-on attack work, then specific fixes.
Agree which LLM applications are in scope and which security concerns matter most to you.
Identify attack vectors relevant to your LLM implementation and use cases.
Test for direct and indirect prompt injection across every input the model reads.
Red team exercises to test guardrails, safety mechanisms, and edge cases.
Assess risks of data leakage, training data extraction, and PII exposure.
Deliver findings with specific recommendations for hardening your LLM systems.
Every LLM vulnerability we found, with a severity rating and the evidence behind it.
Documentation of successful attack chains and exploitation techniques used during testing.
Specific recommendations for hardening your LLM systems against identified threats.
A plan for ongoing LLM security work and monitoring after the test.
Tell us what the application does, which data it can reach, and whether it uses retrieval or tools. We'll scope a test around that.